Amnesty Yugoslavia
pre 8 godina
(Reader, 30 March 2016 16:27) LOL, so your answer to icj1's question about an example is: 'you made a typo when writing, buhahaha'.
---
Your illiteracy is well documented, so ignore the false moniker and READ my response.
On 29 Mar 17:07 I actually wrote: “Not sure what 250 pages you're referring to but as a supreme and blind apologist for the ICTY it's no surprise that you don't even know the length of the ICTY writings, let alone any of the content”
If you can read (proven otherwise), you won’t find any reference to typo in the responses.
The topic is “direct evidence” and a first step is to agree on definitions. This is particularly important for imposters such as icj1/Reader who’ve previously disregarded and failed to read referenced material.
icj1 was ignorant of the length or content of the referenced document. I supplied icj1 with the information. I also started the process of defining “direct evidence” by spoon-feeding icj1 examples of his/her comments (ie direct evidence) that provide plain proof of idiocy.
We also thank you for your valuable contribution to this effort by supplying yet more examples of direct evidence. Your false quote of words, which I never wrote, is another text book example of direct evidence clearly proving (again) that you as READER can not read.
111 Komentari
Sortiraj po: