13

Friday, 17.06.2011.

14:32

EU wants more than 20 privatizations investigated

Interior Minister Ivica Dačić has confirmed the EU has sent a letter to Serbian authorities asking them to investigate the privatization of over 20 companies.

Izvor: Tanjug

EU wants more than 20 privatizations investigated IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

13 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

Reader

pre 13 godina

EU should ask to the UNSC that these investigations be done by a proper ad hoc body of the UN, as the Serbian state cannot investigate itself. The investigations would be not credible. The investigators live in the same country as the investigated, therefore they would be in danger. These investigations should be handled by an office of the UN residing in Zurich, or Brussels. Carla del Ponte might be able to help, she is a really good prosecutor and looking for a job.

privatize it

pre 13 godina

And people kept asking from the start: What is the government going to do for money once there's nothing left to privatize?
(ida, 19 June 2011 06:04)

There is a lot left to privatize. Infrastructures, police, hospitals, judges, parliament, constitution, prisons, schools, army. Whoever buys these things can than sell their services to the citizens more efficiently. In euros of course. 1 kg of justice for 100 euros. that would be a good deal.

ida

pre 13 godina

None of all this privatization - which westerners pressured Serbia to do as they pushed in a government with aims to do a ton of privatization - has helped the Serbian economy at all. There was better employment and production before the privatizations.
And people kept asking from the start: What is the government going to do for money once there's nothing left to privatize?

Hoo

pre 13 godina

They bombed our domestic infrastructure and state owned companies in order to enslave us under eternal debt like all their other colonies and they still want more? Throw Tadic & his gang of Quislings to the dustbin of history and go east!

lowe

pre 13 godina

Gosh, Serbia is not even anywhere close to membership yet, and the EU is already giving her orders on how to run her economy. Someone should give that Serbian president a good knock on the head!

george

pre 13 godina

I wonder what Serbs will do when they are in the same situation as the Greeks.You made your bed and now you must lay in it.Selling your souls to the EU/US/NATO will only make you come under the control of the STRONG EU COUNTRIES,and will only make you weak.

Yaroslav

pre 13 godina

Only 20 to be investigated. I'd recommend adding to 00 to that number.

The EU is not concerned with jsutice or stopping corrupt dealings, the EU is concerned withpolitics. A quick glance at the list:

* Sartid, U.S. Steel - a German company failed to win this corrupt tender. The German company has never really revealed what it offered for Sartid.
* C market - Slovenia's Merkator failed to become the owner.
* Port of Belgrade - an Austrian citizen failed (I beleive this one's privatization isn't finalized yet).

The EU seems to only be concerned with corrupt deals when EU companies fail to corruptly gain hold of a company. The EU has no concern with the 1980+ deals where the likes of Miskovic are involved.

The Brit

pre 13 godina

For all the downsides of the EU, it does present one or two positives, not least the ability to force governments to shine light on dodgy deals like some of these appear to have been (and we all know which ones).

Yaroslav

pre 13 godina

Only 20 to be investigated. I'd recommend adding to 00 to that number.

The EU is not concerned with jsutice or stopping corrupt dealings, the EU is concerned withpolitics. A quick glance at the list:

* Sartid, U.S. Steel - a German company failed to win this corrupt tender. The German company has never really revealed what it offered for Sartid.
* C market - Slovenia's Merkator failed to become the owner.
* Port of Belgrade - an Austrian citizen failed (I beleive this one's privatization isn't finalized yet).

The EU seems to only be concerned with corrupt deals when EU companies fail to corruptly gain hold of a company. The EU has no concern with the 1980+ deals where the likes of Miskovic are involved.

The Brit

pre 13 godina

For all the downsides of the EU, it does present one or two positives, not least the ability to force governments to shine light on dodgy deals like some of these appear to have been (and we all know which ones).

lowe

pre 13 godina

Gosh, Serbia is not even anywhere close to membership yet, and the EU is already giving her orders on how to run her economy. Someone should give that Serbian president a good knock on the head!

george

pre 13 godina

I wonder what Serbs will do when they are in the same situation as the Greeks.You made your bed and now you must lay in it.Selling your souls to the EU/US/NATO will only make you come under the control of the STRONG EU COUNTRIES,and will only make you weak.

Hoo

pre 13 godina

They bombed our domestic infrastructure and state owned companies in order to enslave us under eternal debt like all their other colonies and they still want more? Throw Tadic & his gang of Quislings to the dustbin of history and go east!

ida

pre 13 godina

None of all this privatization - which westerners pressured Serbia to do as they pushed in a government with aims to do a ton of privatization - has helped the Serbian economy at all. There was better employment and production before the privatizations.
And people kept asking from the start: What is the government going to do for money once there's nothing left to privatize?

Reader

pre 13 godina

EU should ask to the UNSC that these investigations be done by a proper ad hoc body of the UN, as the Serbian state cannot investigate itself. The investigations would be not credible. The investigators live in the same country as the investigated, therefore they would be in danger. These investigations should be handled by an office of the UN residing in Zurich, or Brussels. Carla del Ponte might be able to help, she is a really good prosecutor and looking for a job.

privatize it

pre 13 godina

And people kept asking from the start: What is the government going to do for money once there's nothing left to privatize?
(ida, 19 June 2011 06:04)

There is a lot left to privatize. Infrastructures, police, hospitals, judges, parliament, constitution, prisons, schools, army. Whoever buys these things can than sell their services to the citizens more efficiently. In euros of course. 1 kg of justice for 100 euros. that would be a good deal.

The Brit

pre 13 godina

For all the downsides of the EU, it does present one or two positives, not least the ability to force governments to shine light on dodgy deals like some of these appear to have been (and we all know which ones).

Hoo

pre 13 godina

They bombed our domestic infrastructure and state owned companies in order to enslave us under eternal debt like all their other colonies and they still want more? Throw Tadic & his gang of Quislings to the dustbin of history and go east!

george

pre 13 godina

I wonder what Serbs will do when they are in the same situation as the Greeks.You made your bed and now you must lay in it.Selling your souls to the EU/US/NATO will only make you come under the control of the STRONG EU COUNTRIES,and will only make you weak.

lowe

pre 13 godina

Gosh, Serbia is not even anywhere close to membership yet, and the EU is already giving her orders on how to run her economy. Someone should give that Serbian president a good knock on the head!

ida

pre 13 godina

None of all this privatization - which westerners pressured Serbia to do as they pushed in a government with aims to do a ton of privatization - has helped the Serbian economy at all. There was better employment and production before the privatizations.
And people kept asking from the start: What is the government going to do for money once there's nothing left to privatize?

Yaroslav

pre 13 godina

Only 20 to be investigated. I'd recommend adding to 00 to that number.

The EU is not concerned with jsutice or stopping corrupt dealings, the EU is concerned withpolitics. A quick glance at the list:

* Sartid, U.S. Steel - a German company failed to win this corrupt tender. The German company has never really revealed what it offered for Sartid.
* C market - Slovenia's Merkator failed to become the owner.
* Port of Belgrade - an Austrian citizen failed (I beleive this one's privatization isn't finalized yet).

The EU seems to only be concerned with corrupt deals when EU companies fail to corruptly gain hold of a company. The EU has no concern with the 1980+ deals where the likes of Miskovic are involved.

Reader

pre 13 godina

EU should ask to the UNSC that these investigations be done by a proper ad hoc body of the UN, as the Serbian state cannot investigate itself. The investigations would be not credible. The investigators live in the same country as the investigated, therefore they would be in danger. These investigations should be handled by an office of the UN residing in Zurich, or Brussels. Carla del Ponte might be able to help, she is a really good prosecutor and looking for a job.

privatize it

pre 13 godina

And people kept asking from the start: What is the government going to do for money once there's nothing left to privatize?
(ida, 19 June 2011 06:04)

There is a lot left to privatize. Infrastructures, police, hospitals, judges, parliament, constitution, prisons, schools, army. Whoever buys these things can than sell their services to the citizens more efficiently. In euros of course. 1 kg of justice for 100 euros. that would be a good deal.