Alexander James
pre 18 godina
Lazar, I notice that Daniel didn't even mention Srebrenica but rather Mladic and Karadzic. I'm sure you chose to mention it because Srebrenica and Mladic and Karadzic are intrinsically linked.
Your reply is however a farce. The '3,000 serbian civilians being killed in the region' is generally considered an unreliable number - 2,000 Serbs killed, including both civilians and combatants is generally considered more accurate. Of course every death is a tragedy in war.
As for the description of the Bosnian war being a civil war in which everyone killed everyone, that's a typical, desperate ultra-nationalist view of the Bosnian war. There were elements of civil war but there were strong elements of participation of neighbouring states in the conflict. And everyone killing everyone is an apologists way of saying some killed much more than others.
Finally, your comment that 'the criminals made a suicide run and charged the serbs, instead of surrendering' is an astonishing and obscene remark based on what is quite clearly an absurd, fictional view of Europe's worst massacre since WWII. No better than the disgraceful ideology that fueled the July 95 massacre in the first place.
Of course, this was supposed to be a discussion of economics. Go with Russia? Sure, that sounds like a splendid idea. Proceed...
6 Komentari
Sortiraj po: