Independent commission reiterates: "There was no genocide" PHOTO

Naturally there was no genocide at Srebrenica. It’s a made-up idea by the US to try and force the Serbs into submission and accept all the blame thus white washing the illegal action taken by the west to bomb Serbia.
“….. it is very important that the notion of genocide as a crime must not be distorted.”
Yes, that is correct. Its imperative that the use of the word genocide be carefully used. If used incorrectly that word becomes distorted and meaningless.
Its already started with the US claiming genocide with the Uyghurs in China when there is no evidence of that occurring.
This report now makes an absolute mockery of Inzko and his “law”.

Of course. The so called genocide is a narrative spun by Muslim separatists and their foreign sponsors who violently wanted to detach land from their Orthodox brothers. It would have been better for them to stay united in one country.

That did happen in Srebrenica. If that is not being classified as "genocide", than please provide a better explanation, what "genocide" really is.
(Ataman, 25 August 2021 23:59)

Literacy is a problem for you lad so let me explain. Genocide means that you eliminate men, women and children of all ages; nothing is left to continue the particular ethnic group. That is Genocide.
If you still have difficulty understanding look up the criteria for genocide on the UN website.

Independent" LOL
(dw, 25 August 2021 08:52)

You mean Adolph that only the west can have independent commissions of inquiry? Well I never LOL.

I do not understand this at all. For me, a wanton murder of sufficiently large group of people for ethnic, racial of religious reason is a genocide.

That did happen in Srebrenica. If that is not being classified as "genocide", than please provide a better explanation, what "genocide" really is.
(Ataman, 25 August 2021 23:59)

This is a poor argument as you have not defined “sufficiently large group if people”.. how much is large 10, 20, 30etcc…

Furthermore its not even the definition of genocide. Genocide is the act of destroying a group of people, where people can be further defined (etc Jews in Ww2)… in Srebrenica being that women and children were spared, it cannot be considered genocide, as the next generation of people (children) were not even targeted nor were women.

This is why it wont survive the test of time nor will Serbs ever admit it. if you can prove that the entire Group (muslems) in Srebrenica were targeted than thats a different story, however there are lots of videos of civilians being bussed out, so it’s pointless to even try.

"Independent" LOL

I do not understand this at all. For me, a wanton murder of sufficiently large group of people for ethnic, racial of religious reason is a genocide.

That did happen in Srebrenica. If that is not being classified as "genocide", than please provide a better explanation, what "genocide" really is.

Literacy is a problem for you lad so let me explain.
(sj, 26 August 2021 09:51)

1) If literacy is a problem for me, why do you write anything?
2) I am honesty unsure. The best way to explain are personal attacks, right?


This is a poor argument as you have not defined “sufficiently large group if people”.. how much is large 10, 20, 30etcc…
(M, 26 August 2021 05:05)

Where do you see me arguing? This is a nonsense.
This is not the way to answer, very poor style.

"Thanks", but no thanks. This was kind of Tom O'Sleazy style "answer".

You mean Adolph that only the west can have independent commissions of inquiry? Well I never LOL.
(sj, 26 August 2021 09:53)

I don't think, his name is Adolph. Message understood, but it is a personal attack, Tom L'O-Fuzzy - style.

Article says: "This is the conclusion of the Independent International Commission for the Study of the Suffering of All Nations in the Srebrenica Region in the period 1992-1995, formed by the Government of Republika Srpska.". I understand that someone doubts, that such commission is neutral. But maybe it is. No idea here. Arguments?

From this source: https://tass.ru/info/2109261

"По разным данным, были убиты 7-8 тыс. человек, включая гражданских лиц, пытавшихся покинуть город. Среди них были порядка 500 подростков, не достигших 18 лет."

"Впервые события в Сребренице были квалифицированы органами международного правосудия как геноцид 19 апреля 2004 года, когда МТБЮ выносил приговор генералу Радиславу Крстичу (приговорен к 35 годам заключения)."

The source is not fox or cnn, it is tass.ru.

Based on the text they write, for me it looks, like a genocide.
In particular this part: "Среди них были порядка 500 подростков".

Take note, TASS has a very neutral tone, but no explanation. It is telling that Lavrov does not consider it a genocide, but China, Venezuela, Nigeria, Angola did abstain from the vote.

Position of TASS seem to be neutral, even towards Lavrov, without arguments. So please explain instead of swearing.

I do not understand this at all. For me, a wanton murder of sufficiently large group of people for ethnic, racial of religious reason is a genocide.

That did happen in Srebrenica. If that is not being classified as "genocide", than please provide a better explanation, what "genocide" really is.

"Independent" LOL

Naturally there was no genocide at Srebrenica. It’s a made-up idea by the US to try and force the Serbs into submission and accept all the blame thus white washing the illegal action taken by the west to bomb Serbia.
“….. it is very important that the notion of genocide as a crime must not be distorted.”
Yes, that is correct. Its imperative that the use of the word genocide be carefully used. If used incorrectly that word becomes distorted and meaningless.
Its already started with the US claiming genocide with the Uyghurs in China when there is no evidence of that occurring.
This report now makes an absolute mockery of Inzko and his “law”.

Of course. The so called genocide is a narrative spun by Muslim separatists and their foreign sponsors who violently wanted to detach land from their Orthodox brothers. It would have been better for them to stay united in one country.

I do not understand this at all. For me, a wanton murder of sufficiently large group of people for ethnic, racial of religious reason is a genocide.

That did happen in Srebrenica. If that is not being classified as "genocide", than please provide a better explanation, what "genocide" really is.
(Ataman, 25 August 2021 23:59)

This is a poor argument as you have not defined “sufficiently large group if people”.. how much is large 10, 20, 30etcc…

Furthermore its not even the definition of genocide. Genocide is the act of destroying a group of people, where people can be further defined (etc Jews in Ww2)… in Srebrenica being that women and children were spared, it cannot be considered genocide, as the next generation of people (children) were not even targeted nor were women.

This is why it wont survive the test of time nor will Serbs ever admit it. if you can prove that the entire Group (muslems) in Srebrenica were targeted than thats a different story, however there are lots of videos of civilians being bussed out, so it’s pointless to even try.

That did happen in Srebrenica. If that is not being classified as "genocide", than please provide a better explanation, what "genocide" really is.
(Ataman, 25 August 2021 23:59)

Literacy is a problem for you lad so let me explain. Genocide means that you eliminate men, women and children of all ages; nothing is left to continue the particular ethnic group. That is Genocide.
If you still have difficulty understanding look up the criteria for genocide on the UN website.

Independent" LOL
(dw, 25 August 2021 08:52)

You mean Adolph that only the west can have independent commissions of inquiry? Well I never LOL.

Literacy is a problem for you lad so let me explain.
(sj, 26 August 2021 09:51)

1) If literacy is a problem for me, why do you write anything?
2) I am honesty unsure. The best way to explain are personal attacks, right?


This is a poor argument as you have not defined “sufficiently large group if people”.. how much is large 10, 20, 30etcc…
(M, 26 August 2021 05:05)

Where do you see me arguing? This is a nonsense.
This is not the way to answer, very poor style.

"Thanks", but no thanks. This was kind of Tom O'Sleazy style "answer".

You mean Adolph that only the west can have independent commissions of inquiry? Well I never LOL.
(sj, 26 August 2021 09:53)

I don't think, his name is Adolph. Message understood, but it is a personal attack, Tom L'O-Fuzzy - style.

Article says: "This is the conclusion of the Independent International Commission for the Study of the Suffering of All Nations in the Srebrenica Region in the period 1992-1995, formed by the Government of Republika Srpska.". I understand that someone doubts, that such commission is neutral. But maybe it is. No idea here. Arguments?

From this source: https://tass.ru/info/2109261

"По разным данным, были убиты 7-8 тыс. человек, включая гражданских лиц, пытавшихся покинуть город. Среди них были порядка 500 подростков, не достигших 18 лет."

"Впервые события в Сребренице были квалифицированы органами международного правосудия как геноцид 19 апреля 2004 года, когда МТБЮ выносил приговор генералу Радиславу Крстичу (приговорен к 35 годам заключения)."

The source is not fox or cnn, it is tass.ru.

Based on the text they write, for me it looks, like a genocide.
In particular this part: "Среди них были порядка 500 подростков".

Take note, TASS has a very neutral tone, but no explanation. It is telling that Lavrov does not consider it a genocide, but China, Venezuela, Nigeria, Angola did abstain from the vote.

Position of TASS seem to be neutral, even towards Lavrov, without arguments. So please explain instead of swearing.